Sample Newsletter February 2005

Phytobiophysics - A Vaccine Alternative

A summary of a talk given by John Meldrum at the 2004 Spring Meeting

Phytobiophysics has been researched and developed by Dame Diana Mossop for more than 20 years; although it is more powerful. the system is comparable to Bach flower remedies. There are 20 basic phytobiophysical remedies, each of which is derived from many different plants and each of which corresponds to a particular frequency band.

All living systems vibrate at a characteristic frequency and every cell emits a tiny quantum of light. Because cells only function normally when vibrating at their correct frequency the first sign of ill health is when an organ or tissue begins vibrating at the wrong frequency. When a phytobiophysical remedy of an appropriate frequency is taken the frequency of vibration of the affected organ can be corrected so that its ability to emit the correct frequencyand its functional capacity is restored.

It has been discovered that frequency changes can be measured by a galvanometer when someone has become ill and similar changes have been measured when a vaccine has been given to a healthy person. From observations such as these it has been possible to infer that an appropriate flower formula can provide protection against a disease as well as provide protection against the possible side effects that can sometimes be produced following vaccination against that disease.

When animal organs are transplanted into man it is recognised that there is a danger of also transplanting viruses or bacteria which are normally only found in animals, and similar dangers seem to be associated with the use of certain vaccines. Diana Mossop has found when testing vaccines and vaccinated people that reproducible frequency changes can sometimes be identified which correspond to specific viral or bacterial infections normally only found in animal tissues. In themselves such frequency changes do not necessarily indicate that a vaccine is responsible, but they need to be taken seriously. For instance, it has been suggested that there was a connection between the introduction of smallpox vaccination and an increase in molar tooth decay, and that an increase in tonsillitis followed the introduction of diphtheria and bovine TBvaccines. It remains unclear why such associations develop although bioresonance studies show that vaccines often have the same frequency abnormalities as the apparently unrelated conditions which sometimes follow their use.

Some vaccines produce frequency changes corresponding to those associated with anaphylactic attack. Diana Mossop's studies have indicated that in susceptible children the tendency to develop autism manifests itself after the use of the diphtheria vaccine, but it is the frequency change that can occur after the use of the MMR vaccine which can induce frank autism. It has been shown in America that when the DPT vaccine contains mercury it produces six times the incidence of autism compared with when the vaccine does not contain mercury. Diphtheria and mercury resonate at the same frequency.

Flower formulae have been made to provide protection for a range of infectious diseases and their vaccines. Phytobiophysics supplies a vaccine box containing a supply of small tubes containing flower formulae which correspond to the vaccines and protect children. These can be added to bottle feeds or taken by mothers who breast feed. Claims have been made that flower formulae can be used instead of vaccination, or to prevent the side effects of vaccination, or to protect unvaccinated children who may become infected by children who have been recently vaccinated.

Note: The purpose of this summary is to inform readers and not to encourage the use of phytobiophysics as an alternative to vaccination. It is possible to make a strong case for the use of most vaccines.